Wednesday, April 11, 2012
Augusta, GA
By
The Downtowner
Augusta’s downtown has been patrolled by a nine-man team for the past four
years, and at the end of the year it will be up to the property owners to
decide whether to keep them working.
Clean Augusta Downtown Initiative (CADI) began in early 2008 as a way to make
downtown Augusta more clean, safe and friendly. Through the Great Recession and
into the slow economic recovery, property owners inside the
Business
Improvement District (BID) have been paying .00725 cents on every dollar of their
property value to fund the
$ 365,000-a-year program. (
Augusta Chronicle;February 4, 2012).
As the 5
th year of this program approaches an end, downtown
business owners will decide once again whether to continue to fund this
program. It will take 51 percent of the
downtown property owners to keep the CADI program in
place. As a downtown regular, I decided to poke around a little bit to see how this
program came into being and how business owners feel about the use of their tax
dollars which now exists in triplicate
for them. That’s right, property owners in the BID are being taxed three times
for their city services. Not only do they pay county taxes, they pay a tax that
seems to be left over after consolidation called, “Urban Maintenance and
Operation.” The BID was established in 2008 which levied a third tax. How did
this happen and what are they getting for all of this money?
In 2007, the DDA began their campaign to encourage business owners to form a
Business Improvement District which would allow the city to collect a special
tax that would be used to help with issues specific to downtown. When talking
to downtown business owners about this, most recollect that public safety was
the issue discussed most often. As a matter of fact, paying for an expanded public
safety presence downtown was a huge selling point in getting the owners to agree to the program.
Who doesn’t want more safety in downtown Augusta? It is a necessity for
businesses to thrive.
As the petition drive continued and meetings were held, I
have been told that many business owners who were in opposition were not made
aware of the meetings and were quietly left out of the loop. In July of 2007
with petition in hand and the new ordinance drawn up, DDA director
Margaret
Woodard presented all relevant documents to the Augusta Commission for
approval.
According to meeting minutes,
Commissioner Jerry Brigham began to
question how a Board of Directors would be set up since this was not mentioned
in the ordinance. He commented that this needed to be spelled out since so much
money would be going through the hands of the board members. At this point in
the minutes, someone identified only as, “Byrd,” assured Commissioner Brigham
that the business owners in the BID would be nominating and voting for their
own board members, (Byrd is quite possibly
Byrd Warlick the DDA attorney).
Satisfied with the answer, the Commissioners proceeded with a vote to enact the
new ordinance without the clarification in writing….Mistake number one.
Now let’s fast forward to January of 2008. The minutes of the very first Board
of Directors meeting for CADI show that all board members had been established
and were in attendance at this meeting. Who nominated them and when did the
business owners vote on them? Owners I have spoken with never saw a ballot. The
result and mistake number two was that the early board members were obviously
hand picked by the DDA.
Business Improvement District board members:
- Donald Bailey, Davenport Bruker, Len Carter, Bryan Halterman, Tennet
Houston, Paul King, Robert Kuhar, Darryl Leech, Sanford Loyd, Julian Osbon, Jeff
Partl, City Administrator Fred Russell, Tillman Sauls, Berry Smith, CVB Director Barry White, and Margaret Woodard.
Sorry folks. When I think of Downtown Augusta, I think of,
Bonnie Ruben, Coco Rubio, David Hutchinson, Robin Schweitzer, Oolie, Jai West,
Fred Daitch, Pat Johansen…Shall I go on? Where is the true representation on
this Board?
Now that a bit of the stinky history is out of the way, The
question that needs to be answered, Is CADI worth another five year investment?
This downtowner says, “No way!” At least
not in its present state, and I have found that many downtown business owners
are in agreement. Following are a few of the complaints that will have to be
addressed:
- Why are we paying CADI to do what we’re already paying the city to do?
- Why was CADI never about Public Safety as we were told it would be?
- Where is all of the equipment CADI started off with? Especially those machines that suck up cigarette butts.
- Where does $350,000 a year go with only 7 employees?
- Why does CADI now charge for graffiti removal? (Business owners were initially told that would be a principal responsibility of The CADI program)
- Why does CADI take care of the Board of Education property?
- Where is our Board Representation for downtown business owners?
- Why does the DDA charge $25,000 a year to oversee this program?
- Where is the survey from the DDA that was supposed to have been delivered to
business owners by the end of March 2012 (according to the February 2012
Director’s Report).
- Will those of us who are in opposition be left out of the new process?
These are all great questions that need to be answered. As a downtown regular I see more vagrants and panhandlers than ever before. I strongly believe that Public Safety is the main ingredient that is lacking for downtown to be able to thrive. If there is a perception that the area is unsafe, then people won't come and spend their money, and having a more visible public safety presence gives people the perception that the area is safer. Downtown business owners were told that CADI would primarily serve that purpose, but that clearly has not happened.
Just think of what could really be accomplished with $350,000 a year of extra tax money with the right visionary in charge of the DDA? Just imagine what could be accomplished downtown with more downtown business owners being included in the process. Now is the time for the downtown business owners to organize, research, and take a stand. Do not let this opportunity to make a huge change pass you by. Become informed and get what you deserve, not what the DDA thinks you deserve. We are depending on you! Downtown is depending on you.***
DT
Stay Tuned
CitysStink.net has initiated an Open Records Request (ORR) on the CADI program and other DDA initiatives. We will have more updates detailing how the DDA misuses public funds and engages in cronyism over how funds are spent and who is appointed to these boards. Stay tuned.
Related Stories:
The Case of the Disappearing Downtown Clock
***Do you have a story idea, a tip, or would you like to write for City Stink? Then please contact us at: citystink@gmail.com***
Share this on Facebook by clicking the icon below